In a faculty advisory committee, what action would diminish the process's effectiveness?

Requiring each faculty representative to reveal the source of written concerns would indeed diminish the effectiveness of the faculty advisory committee. This practice could lead to a lack of trust among faculty members, as they may feel uncomfortable sharing candid concerns if they are compelled to disclose their sources. It may discourage open dialogue and the honest exchange of ideas, which are crucial for the committee's function. Anonymity can help ensure that representatives feel safe bringing up important issues without fear of repercussions, thus fostering a more productive and collaborative environment.

In contrast, allowing representatives to present concerns professionally, ensuring transparency from administration, and encouraging feedback based on peer input all contribute positively to the committee's goals, as they promote open communication, trust, and teamwork which are essential for effective functioning.